No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I am thinking about what exactly should be in the Classic pages. Definitely anything related to gameplay, but I don't think that info like Warcraft III custom maps and lore speculation need to be there. The pages that were created recently seem to be ancient revisions containing ood speculation or old wording of Warcraft III info, which is better covered on the main page. Another question would be the RPG info which is properly sorted and tagged on main pages. [[User:Mordecay|Mordecay]] ([[User talk:Mordecay|talk]]) 23:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
I am thinking about what exactly should be in the Classic pages. Definitely anything related to gameplay, but I don't think that info like Warcraft III custom maps and lore speculation need to be there. The pages that were created recently seem to be ancient revisions containing ood speculation or old wording of Warcraft III info, which is better covered on the main page. Another question would be the RPG info which is properly sorted and tagged on main pages. [[User:Mordecay|Mordecay]] ([[User talk:Mordecay|talk]]) 23:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
:RPG should just be removed entirely from the Classic articles. It isn't canon anyways, should be fine just on the main page. {{User:Surafbrov/Sig}} 23:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
:RPG should just be removed entirely from the Classic articles. It isn't canon anyways, should be fine just on the main page. {{User:Surafbrov/Sig}} 23:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
| − | ::Classic pages should record gameplay related stuff like quests, |
+ | ::Classic pages should record gameplay related stuff like quests, ressource nodes, etc. Also describe the lore at the time of WoW Classic, like saying the Loch is still intact in Loch Modan, etc. RPG and Warcraft III map information are not necessary on classic pages [[User:Xporc|Xporc]] ([[User talk:Xporc|talk]]) 10:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:51, 7 December 2019
So, I was editing a bit when I got an idea. It's inspired from the current {{Faction disambiguation}} template tab as well as Wookieepedia's "Canon/Legends" template tab. Because of divergences in how certain characters and zones are, I thought there could be a tab at the top of a page that moved between the "Classic" and "Current" page. Obviously that would be for zones, but mobs could eventually be given the treatment.
Thoughts?
--Aeliren85 (talk) 03:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hey there. The Classic WoW project kinda went nowhere due to lack of public interest. Current trend seems to have different pages for everything rather than tabs. Xporc (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
I am thinking about what exactly should be in the Classic pages. Definitely anything related to gameplay, but I don't think that info like Warcraft III custom maps and lore speculation need to be there. The pages that were created recently seem to be ancient revisions containing ood speculation or old wording of Warcraft III info, which is better covered on the main page. Another question would be the RPG info which is properly sorted and tagged on main pages. Mordecay (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- RPG should just be removed entirely from the Classic articles. It isn't canon anyways, should be fine just on the main page. — Surafbrov T / C 23:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Classic pages should record gameplay related stuff like quests, ressource nodes, etc. Also describe the lore at the time of WoW Classic, like saying the Loch is still intact in Loch Modan, etc. RPG and Warcraft III map information are not necessary on classic pages Xporc (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)