Why does it say in the quests that he is a Lich? Doesn't look much like a Lich, does he? :S --Odolwa (talk · contr) 10:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- just throwing this out there, but he has no loot and gives no soul shards —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Truckman1 (talk · contr).
- A lich is just an undead necromancer, they do not have to be ban(s)hees as well as necromancers like Kelthuzard (He is a banhee)--The last Alterac (talk · contr) 11:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Since when is Kel'Thuzad a banshee? And a lich is a very specific being in the Warcraft universe. Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Kelthuzad was a banshee ever since he was revived via the sun well.--The last Alterac (talk · contr)
- A banshee? No, he was a LICH ever since he was revived via the sunwell. Sylvanas Windrunner was the one who became a banshee when Arthas killed her and then raised her up as one. Morberis (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- A lich a powerful undead sorceror, possessing tremendous magical power That sentence proves my point.
- Annnyy ways a lich IN GENERAL fiction is just an undead necromancer.--The last Alterac (talk · contr)
- I think he is told to be a lich because he regained his will on his own without the intervention of Sylvanas or any other forsaken. In fact liches as kel'thuzad seem to remain loyal to ner'zhul though preserving independent will and thought in their undeath. Any opinion, idea? --N'Nanz (talk) 19:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)