Talk:Lord Kazzak

From Wowpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I know that Kazzak is featured in Monster Guide. Can someone who owns the book post the picture to his page? Dakovski 04:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Oooh I have an Idea.Since he is in the new x pac and the original,I think he should come out in EVERY x pac,just stronger and a higher rank in the Legion!Ideas?User:Airiph/sig 02:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

His weapon?

Does anyone know if his weapon is listed in WoW Model Viewer? If so, what is it called? Thanks Xarantaur (talk) 22:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

A blue  [Sul'thraze the Lasher] or  [Warmonger].
Rhapsodia (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Xarantaur (talk)


Has it been states whether he was killed in lore, or is his possible death in BC canon? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Carenthir76013 (talk · contr).

RE: "the Supreme"

"the Supreme" is the name given to the uploaded picture in the gallery. The caption: "Kazzak the Supreme, a doomlord" under this picture is cited to Monster Guide, pg. 167. But I don't know exactly what that book says about Kazzak, whether it mentions "the Supreme" or just classifies him as a doomlord. -Aquamonkeyeg (talk) 18:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Mordecay's question of "Where's "the Supreme" from?" the answer is the RPG, which seems to be what he cared about. To me more specific, it is from the Alliance Player's Guide, where Kazzak announces his name as "KIL'JAEDAN'S RIGHT HAND, LORD KAZZAK THE SUPREME". The picture does not have a caption in Monster Guide, though the the section is titled "Lord Kazzak". "Doomlord" is a model name that some people think is a race.
This page is called "Kazzak the Supreme" because of an odd compromise regarding a quirk of WP:NCA, that seems to have gotten stupid. His name is "Lord Kazzak". Make no mistake about that. So, we have (or had) Lord Kazzak in Blasted Lands and Doom Lord Kazzak in Hellfire Peninsula. That is two pages, but those are tactics pages, what about a lore biography?
The solutions could have been shorten it to "Kazzak" (which I think is wrong, but is acceptable per policy), split "Lord Kazzak" into "Lord Kazzak" (with or without a "(lore)") and "Lord Kazzak (tactics)", or find a more complete lore name for him besides "Kazzak". The third option here was taken, by bending a quote from him and then moving both of the old names to tactics pages and then redirecting everything to the lore page, because apparently tactics pages need to be disambiguated that way. Needs fixing, maybe.--SWM2448 20:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Yep, thanks. That's exactly why I asked :) As for his page... really, dunno. Maybe option one or two.--Mordecay (talk) 20:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Since "Lord Kazzak" and "Doom Lord Kazzak" just redirect to this page and "Lord Kazzak (tactics)" and "Doom Lord Kazzak (tactics)" already exist as separate pates, I don't see any real reason why this shouldn't just be moved to "Lord Kazzak". Should this be put to a vote? --Aquamonkeyeg (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Just a thought as was done with Farthing recently, just have Lord Kazzak moved to Kazzak and Lord Kazzak (tactics) to Lord Kazzak. But it would probably be too much to change all redirects.--Mordecay (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

the version in 6.2

it is himself? as "Supreme Lord Kazzak has emerged from the Twisting Nether once again" the word again it wont be again if he was not the same one from BC. waht do you think? simmialr to archimonde . (Yuvyuv111 (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC))

Very likely--Mordecay (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)