Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Pearls"
m (→Cataclysm Pearls: bot, replaced: Dark T Zeratul → DarkTZeratul, [[User talk:Dark T Zeratul| → [[User talk:DarkTZeratul|) |
m (→Cataclysm Pearls: replaced: [[User:DarkTZeratul|DarkTZeratul → [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul, [[User talk:DarkTZeratul| → [[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::::I agree with g0urra, this template is for pearls that are used for professions. Otherwise it would open up the doorways for things like [[Mysterious Pearl]] and [[Luminescent Pearl]]. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 00:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
::::::I agree with g0urra, this template is for pearls that are used for professions. Otherwise it would open up the doorways for things like [[Mysterious Pearl]] and [[Luminescent Pearl]]. {{User:Coobra/Sig4}} 00:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::::Of course not. I'm not asking for every single type of [http://www.wowhead.com/search?q=pearl pearl] to be listed (although that could be done by simply adding a section for '''Quest-item''' pearls. But given what few [[pearl]]s do exist in-game, those pearls which can be found inside clams should be noteworthy enough to be included in this template, regardless of quality or supposed "use". ~ [[User:Tycerius|Tycerius]] ([[User talk:Tycerius|talk]]) 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
:::::::Of course not. I'm not asking for every single type of [http://www.wowhead.com/search?q=pearl pearl] to be listed (although that could be done by simply adding a section for '''Quest-item''' pearls. But given what few [[pearl]]s do exist in-game, those pearls which can be found inside clams should be noteworthy enough to be included in this template, regardless of quality or supposed "use". ~ [[User:Tycerius|Tycerius]] ([[User talk:Tycerius|talk]]) 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | ::::::::It seems to me that the entire point of this template is to show "crafting" pearls. It makes no sense to extend it beyond that. -- [[User: |
+ | ::::::::It seems to me that the entire point of this template is to show "crafting" pearls. It makes no sense to extend it beyond that. -- [[User:Dark T Zeratul|Dark T Zeratul]] ([[User talk:Dark T Zeratul|talk]]) 21:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:17, 28 September 2020
Cataclysm Pearls
Why not? [Darkfathom Pearl] and [Flawless Pearl] are found inside clams just like any other pearl. ~ Tycerius (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Those pearls aren't used for anything else but vendoring. This template should be used for pearls that are used for crafting or has any use at all. --g0urra[T҂C] 23:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Being a gray vendor item doesn't mean it still can't be listed in the template. Other templates list gray items (e.g., {{Arrows}} and {{Bullets}} ).
- Those are for historical references. Arrows and bullets don't exist anymore. --g0urra[T҂C] 00:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- And these pearls do exist. Hence why they should be listed in the template for reference. ~ Tycerius (talk) 00:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- And what purpose would it serve? The grey pearls have no use, unlike the ones that are used for crafting. --g0urra[T҂C] 00:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with g0urra, this template is for pearls that are used for professions. Otherwise it would open up the doorways for things like
[Mysterious Pearl] and 
[Luminescent Pearl]. 
(Sssss/Slithered) 00:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Of course not. I'm not asking for every single type of pearl to be listed (although that could be done by simply adding a section for Quest-item pearls. But given what few pearls do exist in-game, those pearls which can be found inside clams should be noteworthy enough to be included in this template, regardless of quality or supposed "use". ~ Tycerius (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- It seems to me that the entire point of this template is to show "crafting" pearls. It makes no sense to extend it beyond that. -- Dark T Zeratul (talk) 21:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Of course not. I'm not asking for every single type of pearl to be listed (although that could be done by simply adding a section for Quest-item pearls. But given what few pearls do exist in-game, those pearls which can be found inside clams should be noteworthy enough to be included in this template, regardless of quality or supposed "use". ~ Tycerius (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with g0urra, this template is for pearls that are used for professions. Otherwise it would open up the doorways for things like
- And what purpose would it serve? The grey pearls have no use, unlike the ones that are used for crafting. --g0urra[T҂C] 00:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- And these pearls do exist. Hence why they should be listed in the template for reference. ~ Tycerius (talk) 00:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Those are for historical references. Arrows and bullets don't exist anymore. --g0urra[T҂C] 00:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Being a gray vendor item doesn't mean it still can't be listed in the template. Other templates list gray items (e.g., {{Arrows}} and {{Bullets}} ).
