User talk:Resa1983

From Wowpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is Ressy's talk page, where you can leave messages and comments for Ressy.

Your opinion is desired

Hello.

I just wanted to solicit your opinion on whether Instancefooter should replace {{Dungeons}}} or not.

Thanks.

IconSmall Hamuul.gif Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 06:38, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Erunak Stonespeaker

've been using Erunak Stonespeaker as that is who the encounter is created under so it links correctly. There has been a comment made on the page for Erunak Stonespeaker (tactics) to rename it to Mindbender Ghur'sha, which I'm in favor of. I also didn't mean to correct your edit, I had created it under Mindbender but then as I was doing the others I put it under Erunak so I thought I had just forgot to update it. I didn't realize till later that it was someone else =) Tyknee (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Redirects

You have set my redirect on http://www.wowpedia.org/Guild:Templar_Knights_(Mug'thol_US) to Speedy Delete. My guild has moved from Mug'thol to Mannoroth this year. The guild still exists on Mug'thol with a few alts but is completely inactive. The redirect is valid and should not be deleted. Please do not keep the sd tage on the page. If you check the guild homepage you will see that it hasn't been updated yet to reflect Mannoroth and still shows Mug'thol. It is the same guild. Geofferson (talk) 14:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

The Redirect from Mug'thol to Mannoroth Templar Knights was created when I created the actual page on Mannoroth. My google chrome had the edit page in the history link and I editted it in error today, that is the only reason you saw it. It was not deleted yesterday when it was created. I have read the policy on redirects and this redirect is not a violation of any policy. The reason for the redirect is clear. There is no reason for the removal of this redirect. Geofferson (talk) 14:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

The Mug'thol Templar Knights has not disbanded and has more than 10 accounts. It is an Alt Guild. The Main guild is on Mannoroth. Same players, same guild, two different servers. Do what you want but this redirect is valid. One Guild, Two servers and a redirect to link the two. Geofferson (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Query on guild levelling

I've posted a reply on my talk page not sure what the right protocol is on a wiki.

Levva (talk) 17:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Levva

Thanks for cleaning vandalism at WoWWiki

It was very cool of you, even though you may be focusing on Wowpedia. --Gengar orange 22x22.png Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 10:35 AM PST 2 Jan 2011

Sorry, not going to revert

This is true unless you can prove otherwise. If you don't have a process to attribute and you don't tell people how to do it, you're either covering up or avoiding. For all the talk about assuming no one is copying stuff from WoWWiki, there is no evidence. Eventually people will start doing it. Most of the API documenters are going to WoWWiki, not Wowpedia. Unlike several Wowpedia folks, I'm not going to go tell them its the wrong place to put their edits.

This is not the first time I've clashed or disagreed with Pcj and his crew. If you think you're right, please state your case. --Gengar orange 22x22.png Fandyllic (talk · contribs) 7:36 PM PST 5 Jan 2011

I'm completely on Fandyllic's side about the existence of an attribution template, but I have to call bullshit on the notion that "Most of the API documenters are going to WoWWiki, not Wowpedia." Please don't kid yourself just because one person created one page. --Bellocois (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Pcj has a "crew"?--SWM2448 02:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Wowpedia isn't encouraging c&p'ing from wowwiki, hense no template. The same thing wowwiki/Sannse did when it came to Tripping the Rifts as she wanted as few links on wowwiki to wowpedia as possible. IF users begin with the c&p'ing, I can see the need for the template again here on wowpedia. But currently, theres no need as there haven't been any c&p'ing. *shrugs* Its easy enough to compare the RC. Most of wowwiki's edits lately have been Raylan (paid Wikia helper), or fanfic. None of which we want, as we've already completed the zone pages for Cataclysm changes, and who cares about fanfic for a user on another site. Ressy (talk) 03:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

The Golden Kobold

The Golden Kobold is a symbol of hope, work and great candle affinity. The Golden Kobold
Gourra has awarded Ressy with the Golden Kobold, for their work here at Wowpedia!