Welcome to Wowpedia!
Some links you may find useful:
- The things to do category has lots of things to keep you busy!
- Check out the Community portal for some useful editors' links.
- Many Wowpedians frequent our IRC Channel, on chat.freenode.net, #wowpedia.
- Finally, please check out the site guidelines and policies!
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wowpedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (
~~~~) as this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, or need help, just ask on the relevant talk page, or visit the site forums.
Feel free to create a new topic on the Wowpedia forums if you need help with anything!
- 1 faction leaders
- 2 Your opinion is desired
- 3 Techbots
- 4 Revisions
- 5 NPC article titles : RECALL
- 6 Wars timeline
- 7 Dungeon Journal
- 8 Game Guide info
- 9 The Burning Legion destroys life or planets?
- 10 Mistake became canon
- 11 Ashran
- 12 Previews and history pages
- 13 Double references
- 14 Stormwind
- 15 Updates
- 16 War Room
- 17 Preview
I've gotten my information from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU6_RkDlcVs&feature=player_embedded and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay2ZepjL6Vk&feature=player_embedded —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sports72Xtrm (talk · contr).
- That's not official source, and as I said, cata is not live so that information is not currently true. -=- Drazisil [t/c] 15:35, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
You should not just be completely changing info in the summary boxes as asked at Help:Updating for Cataclysm. If you do add things to it, it should have after it. Having it before jut throws off the alignment and makes it look bad. 20:16, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
- This doesn't apply to things like what you did here though. 22:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Your opinion is desired
Hey, just wanted to solicit your opinion on whether WoWWiki should leave Wikia. Thanks! -- ( • ) 22:32, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
What source says that "Techbots" are a type of the arbitrarily named "Gnomish mechs"?--23:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Techbot is a gnomish mech, but the "Gnomish mech" page is a broad category meant for listing types of things, not individuals. Techbot is on this list.-- 00:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
I will revise faulty information. You cannot report me for that. Alliance-biased users are twisting certain topics to favor their opinions. There are forums for such thoughts. This site is simply for information, and to change something to make something else look bad can be considered propaganda, and not fact. People come here for information and I won't give them the wrong idea about a topic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ultimaton100 (talk · contr).
NPC article titles : RECALL
Your opinion is required here, on a policy concerning NPC article titles.
Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 18:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Please voice your opinion, every contributor's pov matters!
- Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 05:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Any thoughts on War/Conflict/Battle and their Prev/Conc/Next?
Loremaster A'noob, Arch Druid of the Noobhoof Clan (talk/contribz) 05:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Good work on adding those to the boss articles, I was also thinking of making some pages for just the journal info at Dungeon Journal, I made the basic layout on how they should appear at Adventure Guide Classic dungeons. Do you have any thoughts or suggestions about this? If you do please use Talk:Dungeon Journal since I'm asking a couple of users. Thank you, 22:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Game Guide info
Hey :) Just wanted to say I like the official flavour texts you've added to the class pages, but I should say that the talents flavour currently has nowhere appropriate to go on those pages. You've generally sat it under abilities or specs, neither of which (especially the latter) is any longer the right place for those quotes. In theory the right page would be <class> abilities (the new equivalent of <class> talents, where the talents are actually listed), but that's not really the right place for flavour text (at least in that the page is basically just a big list rather than a front-end presentation page). Since I don't see detailed info on the talents being added to the main class pages (or indeed any other page) any time soon, I'm not sure where it should go. As it stands it's nice flavour, but a bit odd in its placement. -- Taohinton (talk) 12:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Why did you change the section regarding the Kingdom of Stormwind? It was fine how I edited it. It was more detailed, and things connected to each other, now its jumping from one point of time to the next without explaning what happend. Great job....
The Burning Legion destroys life or planets?
Mistake became canon
Hey, now that you are more active, I have something interesting for ya. Do you remember how u wrote, or actually rewrote stuff from Wolfheart in the Watchers and Jarod pages especially the part where Jarod was appointed leader of the Watchers. This remained on the wiki for several years, but that's not what happened in the book. What happened is:
From the Wolfheart book, ch. 29:
The high priestess acquiesced. “No one can deny you that right, and you have proven your abilities, Jarod. . . which brings me to my first point. Not all of the Watchers were surely aware of Maiev’s plot, and from among those proven innocent I intend to have a new leader appointed. However, the Watchers will play a different role than what we need from you, Jarod.”
“Me? I do not understand.”
“Once, you ably commanded warriors—and even demigods—in battle for us. With my husband’s agreement, I would have you lead a new security force, one designed to deal with troubles . . . such as Maiev.”
The high priestess put a comforting hand on his shoulder. “In regards to Maiev, Shandris will assist you in choosing from among the Sentinels some possible candidates for your new force.”
Later the UVG came out and it wrote similar thing as you wrote, stating that Jarod leads the Watchers. Bear in mind that UVG was written by a fan, not Blizzard, who very likely used wowpedia as source. Then the second book came out and the wording of the sentence was changed to be close to the book's statement.
Previews and history pages
Hey there. Your contributions are greatly appreciated, but I noted you did more than 30 edits to the same Dark Horde article in a short timespan. If you intend to do a lot of edits on a page, please think about working on a document on your computer before comitting a single change, or using the "preview" button to check your edits before saving :p Such articles should have only a handful of edits daily Xporc (talk) 10:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- And definitely don't start a sandbox page because other editors may just take it and copy it into main namespace without much thinking. --Mordecay (talk) 11:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Greetings. Edits such as this one are erroneous, there's no need to repeat the
<ref name="WoWManual">[[World of Warcraft: Game Manual]]</ref> part twice. You can just use
<ref name="WoWManual">[[World of Warcraft: Game Manual]]</ref> once and then only use
<ref name="WoWManual" /> for future refs. Xporc (talk) 10:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
U shuffled some in-game info into the RPG section. Could u clean it so that it contains only RPG info? --Mordecay (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- And I thank you again for your continued, awesome work! :D Xporc (talk) 12:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
I notice you have a number of small edits on Invasion of Gilneas. If you're editing a lot of things on one page and want to see how it looks, you may wish to use the "Show preview" button before saving the page to see that. Thanks! -- ( • ) 12:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)