Template:Archives1
Stoppit and Cleanemup to the rescue!
What an ugly page! :) I'd do something about it, but it's locked ... perhaps someone could see to sorting it out a bit? Bit more professional like? -- Kirkburn 17:41, 1 June 2006 (EDT)
- I already pleaded with Fandyllic to unlock it for a bit but he never got back to me on it :-( --Mikk 05:06, 7 June 2006 (EDT)
- (I blame schmidt though. He ninjaed my thread in fandyllic's talk page.)
- What did I do on Fandyllic's talk page? I don't see at all what you might be referring to. Schmidt 23:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
- Haha. Well, I asked fandyllic to unlock Policies, but then you jumped in and asked why the pages were locked to begin with, and then it degenerated to a discussion on why I was only poking Fandyllic about unlocking, and not you :-) Never mind, the page is updated, I'm happy =) --Mikk 05:39, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
- Oh, I see now that Fandyllic has placed "clean up WoWWiki:Policies" in his work log. Never mind me. :-) --Mikk 06:49, 7 June 2006 (EDT)
Relevance?
Is there a 'relevance' policy? Cause... Sideshow Bob. Who ain't a Major Character. Luci 11:26, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
- Not one yet, and we probably don't really need one. That is clearly out of the scope of this wiki. If you think something is out of scope, you can tag it Template:Tlink. If one of us admins think for some reason it belongs, we won't delete it right off. At that point, we'll decide that it is indeed in scope, or we will set up a vote for deletion, so that others can decide. As well, if someone else came along to it, they would also make a similar judgement, where if they think it should be voted on (that is, in most cases, if they think it should stick around) they will start a vote as well. A guideline might be in order, but I don't think it's that big of a deal right now. I don't think we have many more articles like that. Schmidt 13:25, 29 June 2006 (EDT)